Fareed Zakaria: Bernie Sanders’ magical thinking on climate Fareed Zakaria: Bernie Sanders’ magical thinking on climateKiss my take the prospect of Bernie Sanders becoming the Democratic nominee has started many people who worried that his brand of democratic socialism won’t sell and would pave the way for a second Trump term. This might well be true Patchouli. The more important question is not whether his programs would be popular but the weather, in fact they’re good programs, it’s time to stop reading Bernie Sanders on a curve and start asking what the country would look like if he would have become president.
Let’S consider the topic that he argues is the single greatest challenge facing America and a global emergency climate-change Sanders wants to commit the United States to achieving percent renewable energy for electricity and transportation by 2030. This is a laudable, so ambitious go. The question is, how will he go about meeting it? U. S. carbon emissions fell almost 15 / from 2005 to 2016, according to Calvin breathe the single largest cause for that was the switch from coal-fired power plants to Natural Gas ones.
33 % of the production of solar power by contrast accounted for just 3 %. Nevertheless, Bernie Sanders is opposed to Natural Gas. He opposes all new fracking and he seeks to ban it nationwide within 5 years. Condenser shut down rapidly all gas plants, the wind and solar account for less than 5 % of us energy consumption. So his plan would require an exponential jumping Renewables in just a few years, and even if that happened, it would be extremely difficult to replace gas as a source for electricity.
Using solar and wind are intermittent sources, so they require a backup Source in order to provide electricity, homes, offices and factories. 24/7 Sanders has a solution, storage and if we had the means to destroy electricity on a massive scale such as in batteries, there would be no longer need for backup power. We are not even close to having the kind of storage capacity. We would need to make this work one example: the Clean Air task force calculated that just for California to reach a hundred percent electricity from Renewables.
It would need 36.3 million megawatt hours of energy storage. The whole state currently has just a hundred and fifty thousand megawatt hours of storage. . There is another path to clean energy source that has zero carbon emissions and provides a continuous flow of electricity nuclear power. It generates about 20 % of the electricity in the US, and a majority of power in France have a large portion and Sweden to countries with carbon emission. The ramen, the lowest per person in the industrialized world, but Bernie Sanders opposes nuclear power.
In fact, he plans to shut down all America’s nuclear power plants within 10 years. Fears about nuclear power, a largely based on emotional reactions, to a few high-profile accidents that have taken place over the last few decades. Such anxiety of knows the millions of people who die each year due to fossil fuels. According to one study, nuclear energy is 250 times safer than oil and over 300 times safer than coal. Let me be clear: natural gas and nuclear power have drawbacks and cost.
There is no perfect and dissolution on him today, but I believe that we do infact face of global emergency and we need every means possible to reduce carbon emissions. Now the Sanders green energy plant is magical thinking. It presumes that we can reduce emissions in electricity and transport to 0 and 10 years, while simultaneously shutting down the only two low emissions always available sources of power that collectively provide nearly 60 % of America’s electricity today, and that makes me wonder, is the real problem That Bernie Sanders will lose or the he might win.
Four more go to CNN. curried and read my Washington Post column this week.CNN’s Fareed Zakaria gives his take on why Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has an unrealistic approach to achieving deep cuts in carbon emissions.